Please note this application is under active development. If you spot any errors or something isn't working, please contact us at evidence.service@wales.nhs.uk.

Efficacy and experiences of telephone counselling for informal carers of people with dementia

Lins, S et al. (2014)

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews - https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009126.pub2

Evidence Categories

  • Care setting: Community setting
  • Population group: Adults
  • Population group: Older adults
  • Intervention: Digital Interventions
  • Outcome: Improved social support

Type of Evidence

Systematic Review

Aims

The authors state:

"To produce a quantitative review of the efficacy of telephone counselling for informal carers of people with dementia; to synthesize qualitative studies to explore carers’ experiences of receiving telephone counselling and counsellors’ experiences of conducting telephone counselling; and to integrate and identify aspects of the intervention that are valued and work well, and those interventional components that should be improved or redesigned."

Findings

The authors state:

"Nine RCTs and two qualitative studies were included. Six studies investigated telephone counselling without additional intervention, one study combined telephone counselling with video sessions, and two studies combined it with video sessions and a workbook. All quantitative studies had a high risk of bias in terms of blinding of participants and outcome assessment. Most studies provided no information about random sequence generation and allocation concealment. The quality of the qualitative studies ('thin descriptions') was assessed as moderate.

Meta‐analyses indicated a reduction of depressive symptoms for telephone counselling without additional intervention (three trials, 163 participants: standardised mean different (SMD) 0.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 0.63, P value 0.04; moderate quality evidence). The estimated effects on other outcomes (burden, distress, anxiety, quality of life, self‐efficacy, satisfaction and social support) were uncertain and differences could not be excluded (burden: four trials, 165 participants: SMD 0.45, 95% CI ‐0.01 to 0.90, P value 0.05; moderate quality evidence; support: two trials, 67 participants: SMD 0.25, 95% CI ‐0.24 to 0.73, P value 0.32; low quality evidence).

None of the quantitative studies included reported adverse effects or harm due to telephone counselling.

Three analytical themes (barriers and facilitators for successful implementation of telephone counselling, counsellor's emotional attitude and content of telephone counselling) and 16 descriptive themes that present the carers’ needs for telephone counselling were identified in the thematic synthesis. Integration of quantitative and qualitative data shows potential for improvement. For example, no RCT reported that the counsellor provided 24‐hour availability or that there was debriefing of the counsellor. Also, the qualitative studies covered a limited range of ways of performing telephone counselling."

Conclusions

The authors state:

"There is evidence that telephone counselling can reduce depressive symptoms for carers of people with dementia and that telephone counselling meets important needs of the carer. This result needs to be confirmed in future studies that evaluate efficacy through robust RCTs and the experience aspect through qualitative studies with rich data."

Also In This Category

    No other evidence in this category.