Please note this application is under active development. If you spot any errors or something isn't working, please contact us at evidence.service@wales.nhs.uk.

Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition

Barnett, T et al., (2023)

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews - https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd011538.pub2

Evidence Categories

  • Care setting: Educational Setting
  • Care setting: Non-educational setting
  • Care setting: Multisetting
  • Population group: Physical health condition
  • Population group: Under 5s
  • Population group: 5-to-18 years old
  • Population group: 5-to-11 years old
  • Population group: 11-to-18 years old
  • Intervention: Service provision
  • Outcome: Other outcomes: quality of life, economic outcomes
  • Outcome: social, emotional or mental wellbeing

Type of Evidence

Systematic Review

Aims

To describe the nature of educational support interventions for children and adolescents with a chronic health condition, and to examine the effectiveness of these interventions on school engagement and academic achievement.

Findings

The database searches identified 14,202 titles and abstracts. Grey literature and reference list searches did not identify any additional studies that met the inclusion criteria. One hundred and twelve full‐text studies were assessed for eligibility, of which four studies met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the review.

All studies were randomised controlled studies with a combined total of 359 participants. All included studies were disease‐specific; three studies focused on children with cancer, and one study focused on children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).

There was evidence that education support improved school engagement with three of four studies favouring the intervention. Three studies measured academic achievement but only two studies provided effect estimates. Based on the vote‐counting method, we found contradictory results from the studies: one study showed a positive direction of effect and the other study showed a negative direction of effect. One study measured transition back to school and found a positive impact of education support favouring the intervention (SMD 0.18, 95% CI ‐0.46 to 0.96, no P value reported). The result came from a single study with a small sample size (n = 30), and produced a confidence interval that indicated the possibility of a very small or no effect. The overall certainty of evidence for these three outcomes was judged to be 'very low'.

Two of four studies measured mental health (measured as self‐esteem). Both studies reported a positive impact of education support interventions on mental health; this was the only outcome for which the overall certainty of evidence was judged to be 'low' rather than 'very low'.

No studies measured or reported quality of life or adverse effects.

Overall risk of bias for all studies was assessed as 'high risk' because all studies had at least one domain at high risk of bias.

Conclusions

This review has demonstrated the infancy of quality research on the effectiveness of education support interventions for children and adolescents with chronic health conditions. At best, we can say that we are uncertain whether education support interventions improve either academic achievement or school engagement. Of the secondary outcomes, we are also uncertain whether education support interventions improve transition back to school, or school re‐entry. However, we suggest there is some evidence that education support may slightly improve mental health, measured as self‐esteem. Given the current state of the evidence of the effectiveness of education support interventions for children and adolescents with chronic health conditions, we highlight some important implications for future research in this field to strengthen the evidence that can inform effective practice and policy.