Please note this application is under active development. If you spot any errors or something isn't working, please contact us at evidence.service@wales.nhs.uk.

Interventions for prevention of drug use by young people delivered in non‐school settings

Gates S et al (2006)

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews - https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005030.pub2

Evidence Categories

  • Care setting: Community setting
  • Care setting: Other settings
  • Care setting: School Setting
  • Care setting: Primary care
  • Population group: General Population
  • Intervention: Education Interventions
  • Outcome: Change in drug/alcohol consumption
  • Outcome: Uptake of drugs/alcohol

Type of Evidence

Systematic Review

Aims

"(1) ‐ To summarise the current evidence about the effectiveness of interventions delivered in non‐school settings intended to prevent or reduce drug use by young people under 25; (2) ‐ To investigate whether interventions' effects are modified by the type and setting of the intervention, and the age of young people targeted; (3) ‐ To identify areas where more research is needed."

Findings

"Seventeen studies, 9 cluster randomised studies, with 253 clusters, 8 individually randomised studies with 1230 participants, evaluating four types of intervention: motivational interviewing or brief intervention, education or skills training, family interventions and multi‐component community interventions. Many studies had methodological drawbacks, especially high levels of loss to follow‐up. There were too few studies for firm conclusions. One study of motivational interviewing suggested that this intervention was beneficial on cannabis use. Three family interventions (Focus on Families, Iowa Strengthening Families Program and Preparing for the Drug‐Free Years), each evaluated in only one study, suggested that they may be beneficial in preventing cannabis use. The studies of multi component community interventions did not find any strong effects on drug use outcomes, and the two studies of education and skills training did not find any differences between the intervention and control groups."

Conclusions

"There is a lack of evidence of effectiveness of the included interventions. Motivational interviewing and some family interventions may have some benefit. Cost‐effectiveness has not yet been addressed in any studies, and further research is needed to determine whether any of these interventions can be recommended."