Sylwer fod y cymhwysiad hwn dan ddatblygiad. Os ydych chi'n gweld unrhyw gamgymeriadau neu os nad yw rhywbeth yn gweithio, cysylltwch â ni yn evidence.service@wales.nhs.uk.

Mentoring adolescents to prevent drug and alcohol use

Thomas RE, Lorenzetti D, Spragins W (2011)

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews - https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007381.pub2

Mapiau Tystiolaeth

  • Lleoliadau Gofal: Lleoliad ysgol
  • Grwpiau Poblogaeth: Pobl ifanc
  • Ymyriadau: Ymyriadau addysgol
  • Canlyniad: Newid mewn defnydd o gyffuriau / alcohol
  • Canlyniad: Cymryd cyffuriau / alcohol

Math o Dystiolaeth

Adolygiad Systematig

Nodau

Mae'r awduron yn datgan. "Assess effectiveness of mentoring to prevent adolescent alcohol/drug use."

Canfyddiadau

Mae'r awduron yn datgan. "We identified 4 RCTs (1,194 adolescents). No RCT reported enough detail to assess whether a strong randomisation method was used or allocation was concealed. Blinding was not possible as the intervention was mentoring. Three RCTs provided complete data. No selective reporting. Three RCTs provided evidence about mentoring and preventing alcohol use. We pooled two RCTs (RR for mentoring compared to no intervention = 0.71 (95% CI = 0.57 to 0.90, P value = 0.005). A third RCT found no significant differences. Three RCTs provided evidence about mentoring and preventing drug use, but could not be pooled. One found significantly less use of “illegal" drugs," one did not, and one assessed only marijuana use and found no significant differences. One RCT measured “substance use” without separating alcohol and drugs, and found no difference for mentoring."

Casgliadau

Mae'r awduron yn datgan. "All four RCTs were in the US, and included “deprived” and mostly minority adolescents. Participants were young (in two studies age 12, and in two others 9‐16). All students at baseline were non‐users of alcohol and drugs. Two RCTs found mentoring reduced the rate of initiation of alcohol, and one of drug usage. The ability of the interventions to be effective was limited by the low rates of commencing alcohol and drug use during the intervention period in two studies (the use of marijuana in one study increased to 1% in the experimental and to 1.6% in the control group, and in another study drug usage rose to 6% in the experimental and 11% in the control group). However, in a third study there was scope for the intervention to have an effect as alcohol use rose to 19% in the experimental and 27% in the control group. The studies assessed structured programmes and not informal mentors."